View of sealed doors & windows in back
Vedic design on ceiling of a locked room
Typical Vedic style corridors
The interior water well
Secret walled door that leads to other rooms that leads to other room
Secret bricked door that hides more evidence
Red lotus at apex of the entrance
Rear view of the Taj & 22 apartments
Pavilion where Mumtaz is said to be buried
Palace in Barhanpur where Mumtaz died
Interior of one of the 22 secret rooms
Interior of another of the locked rooms
Inlaid pinnacle pattern in courtyard
Huge ventilator sealed shut with bricks
Frontal view of the Taj Mahal and dome
Close up of the pinnacle
Close up of the dome with pinnacle
Ariel view of Taj Mahal
A marble apartment on ground floor
A locked room on upper floor
300 foot long corridor inside apartments
BBC says about Taj Mahal---Hidden Truth - Never say it is a Tomb Aerial view of the Taj Mahal
NOW READ THIS
....... No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says theTaj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ) .
In the course of his research O ak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court ch ronicle, Badshahnama,Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial . The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur stillretains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place fordead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers. For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal.
He says the term " Mahal " has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria . "The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects. Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani ," he writes. Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace . Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created bycourt sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story. Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a fewsamples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time.Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu templeratherthan a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public . Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi's government t ried to have Prof. Oak's book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the first edition dire consequences . There is only one way to discredit orvalidate Oak's research. The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Ma hal under U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate.
52 comments:
I was wondered when i read about taj mahal,and i scared about our politicins. now it should b opened to world n i call to all hindus to support and keep pressure on govt.
i proud to b a hindu n i pray to god if their is a another birth 2 me that should b as a HINDU.....
no..taj mahal was not a hindu temple. this is wrong interpretation. It was impossible to built such a magnificent hindu temple so close to the mughal capictal at that time unnoticed. there are loads of hindu temples demolished into mosques but not this one.
If you feel the research by Prof O.P.Oak is false the how the carbon dating of the wooden doors used in Taj Mahal dates 300 years older than age of Sahajahan.
The act of cruelty does not vanish without proof. Mulim cruelty is no exception. Some evidences are still available which have been passed as oral tradition from a generation to next. If you go to the villages around jhansi, agra, etawah, kanpur, etah badaun etc. you will find many people who have heard the story from their grandparents that Taj Mahal was a temple and it was plundered by muslims. There may be versions in telling the story about the temple but many old people claim that they heard the story of a great and beautiful Hindu Shiva temple in Agra being plundered by muslims.
I think it is same as teh history of Hindu movement faintly remembered in villages of UP , Rajasthan etc. My grandmother often told me about Shivaji and she said that she got to know about Shivaji from her grandmother. She once told me that her grandmother told her about the military recruitment of Shivaji army in various villages of UP near jhansi, agra etc. Still there are several words in the hindi language of Agra , Etah ,Badaun , Jhansi etc which we find common with Marathi. It shows that these cities saw the arrival of Maratha brigade and culture got mixed. But one thing for sure that Hindu movement against muslims was a successful one across the Bharatvarsha.
Well...There are lot of people in this wicked world who are crazy to be popular and this prof. is one of them..but unfortunatly he has picked the topic that can not be true....As he is giving the example of different views of "Taj Mahal" so why he is not concerning the arabic ayats written on the walls of this islamic building...so now if you say this was the shiv mandir and later Shanjahan grabbed this and made all these things that tends to islamic signs.When he had the power to grab whole mahal..but you people think he had'nt the power of destroying all the signs which according to you are looking as hind's signs(which are not actually...this is just a another prospective which you are taking to your side).
Second....if all the ayats was written on the walls of mahal since the mahal was of Shiv..it means Shiv was a muslim.
Muslim are not part of india. This is main think. And this is shiva temple.If muslim say it is not shiv temple then why u people not open these doors that clocked by Muslim ruller. Come infront and open that doors.
So the reflection of pinnacle by sun shows a kalash. But did you see that the kalash has "Allah" written inside it?
Courtyard is vedic style. However, everything else is "dome style" which is Mughal architecture.
So does BBC even know who is this Mr. P.N. Oak?
Is this anywhere on BBC records? Well I am sorry to say that the answer is No!
Its funny and ironic that we still believe and write about such things with out even researching our self a little bit.
So what does that mean, that there is no difference between our generation and the previous people who destroyed the monument of Babri masjid and in the name of religion on the side of politics.
I wish that we all learn not to fight over our own heritage and let past be past. And be thankful to God that he gave us birth in such a great country.
I will say - Jago hindustanio jaago! LOL
first of all if people say that carbon dating of wooden doors say the wood is as old as 300 years before shahjahan arrived....so why cannot it be possible...does one usees fresh green stems to build doors!!!! aint the trees were older enough from where the wood was derived??? secondly.....the pinnacle has ALLAH inscribed in it...which you hindus cant see and read!! thirdly...all the architecture has domes...which was typical mughal ! and shahjahan's wife was named Mumtaz Mahal which means 'the most loved one in the palace' and on this name itself Taj got its name.....and talkin about the locked doors and the treasure kept inside....the mughals had there secrets rooms in all the palaces they owned.....it doesn;t mean what kept inside was or is you hindu's property!!!!
abe altamash ansari..............shiv ji ek aadmi nahi tha bahan ke takke wo ek devta hai sale jaise tumhara allah hai.......
now listen to me carefully u foolish people putting the nose of our country down..........as the way i think all the facts given by mr. P.N OAK are just rubbish and the literature's available are also fake abt shahjaha.......
abe yaar taaj mahal to mere dada ji k pardada ne banwaya tha unka naam Mr.akram pandit tha,,,,,bhaichare se raho ......samjheeee kya
ye india hai phaltu bakwaas nahi
Hi people, hindu + Musals' (indians).. Plz do some research and find out more from history point of view. I bet we can definitely find more fossil proof to conclude on if this was an ancient temple or did Shajahan really construct it !!1
Also i would say that your voices should be so loud & reach till the PM & President of India so that they can take inititive to openup all the sealed rooms inside TM and findout more about the reality..
Also does anyone has that recorded vedio/audio of what BBC has told about this ? We should first make sure if this new really came from BBC ? Can we contact BBC and findout ? If yes, then on what basis did they conclude ? Is Prof. P N Oak a real person ? What are his complete findings ?
a vinay aeam se bolo
if all sing on taj mahal is of muslim then how u can proof that load shiv has made it if he has made it than it means ge was also muslim because no hindu will make muslim sign on his temple n no muslim will make hindu sign on muslim temple....
so it is clearly seen that taj mahal was made by shahjaha oky.....
who ever is finging this type proof about taj mahal he is the bigest fool.....
n som 1has added a comment that india is hindu country then i should say him that indias half of the popullation is of muslim.....
eg.if i say that taj mahal was made by my grand grandfather than it will be my its just a joke....
sab se pehle ye bata du,, k mandir ho ya masjid khud bhagwan or allah nai banate,, dusri baat, jo ye kehte hai k kalash pe allah likha hai to,, shiv ji muslim hue,, wo aisa b soch le k kisi ne allah pe ungli nai uthayi hai,, so pls unhe beech me naa laye,, raha sawal taj ka,, to wo Temple ho sakta hai,, nai bhi ho sakta,, darwaze khul jayenge to saaf ho jayega,, agar muslim logo ne banwaya to bhi hamara hai,, hinduo ne banaya to bhi hamara hai,,, jai shree raam
ho sakta he ki taj mahal tejo malalya ho .arthath shiv ka mandir ho isiliye mujhe to yah samasya badi gambhir lagi . is samasya ka nirvakaran tabhi hoga jab taj mahal par riserch kar band kothiyo ko khola jaiga aur uske khilaf pukhta saboot ikatthe kiye jaye. isliye mera sujhav yahi he ki hame itihas ka man rakhte hue taj par anubhaviyo dwara risearch ki anumati dine hogi.
Why dont the government throw some light on this by setting a reaserch committee by the archealogical groups containing international archealogists.Who knows like Babri masjid it is also built on a temple.History says that muslim rulers demolished hindu temples or madified them in to mosques and it is natural that to increase muslim religion culture these type of things are done by then rulers.but ultimately those days are gone and now we should think about the development of our country and keep historical facts as historical with truth in it.
this sure that taj mahal was not made by shahjahan but before him it was a Hindu madir " TEJO MAHALY " where lord shiv was worshiped by Hindu's .
but govt. of India will never accept it because the politician thought that Muslim are running there politics.they also think that Hindu are week and never will ask for there right on "TEJO MAHALY"
this sure that taj mahal was not made by shahjahan but before him it was a Hindu madir " TEJO MAHALY " where lord shiv was worshiped by Hindu's .
but govt. of India will never accept it because the politician thought that Muslim are running there politics.they also think that Hindu are week and never will ask for there right on "TEJO MAHALY"
I think in modern era if anybody are just talking about past facts its just bullshit, just handover it to UN investigation whatever is the results came from team and accept it, everything is possible my dear friends...the big factor is this uneducated votebank in india which creates this problem not only Tajmahal even all temples and Mosques must be investigated by carbon sating and archeologist, be open to everything it might be possible may be there is any mosque we can found in temple as well..
Hamare aur aapke tark karne se na to kuch prove hua hai aur na he hoga...ye to bas ek tarika hai apne ander ke shaitan ko shant karne ka...main ye manta hoon ki na mere kahne se government ye darwaze khulwayegi aur na he koi ye manega ki ye mandir par bana ek maqbara hai ya sach main ek maqbara hai...aur jo bhi log unche padon par baithe hain vo in sab cheezon ki jaanch karane main saksham hai par na to vo jaanch karvange he aur na he satya ko samne layenge...chahe vo government Congress ki ho ya BJP ki...ye sab ek he thali ke chatte batte hain aur hum logon ko ladva kar ke sirf apna ulluo seedha karna jante hain...GOD bless my country and countrymen
JAGO HINDU JAGO! it,s a lord shiva, tample...
ARRE YAAR MANDIR HO YA MUSLIM BUILDING... HAI TO AJOOBA.. OR HAIN TO INDIA ME.. OR JO MUSLIM INDIA ME RAHTE HAIN WO BHI INDIAN HAIN.. OR JO HINDU YNHA RAHTE HAIN WO BHI INDIAN.. TO KIS BAAT PE BAHAS...
sach baat jab hindu or mushlim sabhi yaha aa sakte he or taj mahal ki sundarta dekh sakte he toh .... Jhagda kis bat ka.... Bese bhi india me bahut mandir majjid he ....TAJ ko TAJ rehne do...mandir or majjid bana ker kya ker lenge...
hamare khandan ke jo raja the unka naam raaja jai singh tha unke mahal me aaj bhi evidence rakhkhe hai mullao ne maanga hamne de diya hamara dil bahot bada hai
hamare khandan ke jo raja the unka naam raaja jai singh tha unke mahal me aaj bhi evidence rakhkhe hai mullao ne maanga hamne de diya hamara dil bahot bada hai
Hiii... are bhai zagada kyu kar rahe ho....??? jo bhi hai hum INDIAN ka hi to hai....
Hey.m want gives sme veiws on this topic....first of all i heartly appretiate the research which was was conducted by prof. P.N oak....n may b he is right..bt according to my knowledge..the design of taj mahal is taken from different diffrnt mughal buildings such as frm humayun's tomb , akbar's fort etc... all mughal emprors...so how could it can be a shiv temple.....n secndly and most importantly according to my guide wen i visited taj mahal the word "TAJ" is derived from the design ...which is created inside the taj's building.that is if u observe the pattern which is surrounding the artificial graves of king and queen it is a crown shaped.....so....the word taj must b originated frm there.....bt may b i am not right...these were my point of veiw...thanxx fot reading
if it was not a hindu monument then y was it needed to close many rooms which have many secrets by a shahjan
if it was not a hindu monument then y was it needed to close many rooms which have many secrets by a shahjan
Deepika and vinita sharma itna raham ara to ja chat le muslimo ka apni upar bi banwa le unka tajmahal hinduo ki astha ko kalank muslim kam tumdono jada kare ho dehli me rape tumdono ka hona chaiye tha :-@
Agr sare muslman khe ki taj sahjanh ne bnvaya. Man le to vo btaye
1 iski neeb sahjanh se phle kisne rkhi .
2 koi esa mkvra btaoo jha pani ki bood ka chamtkar hota ho . Ye to ab tk siv ki pindi pr boond tpkti haiii.
Tum 2 ka javab do fir me 2 question puchhunga. . .???
Boss Do not fight ,better open all the locked rooms in presence of UN and ASI with tight security and tell the world.What is wrong ?Doodh ka Doodh panni ka pani.
let us start "MOHIM" for opening the all the sealed /bricked walls.Put pressure on government but be fair both group should come togather and do this job peacfully ,no DANGA NO FASAD.
kitni b apni maa bahn chuda lo ye humara tha hai rhega smje kafiro tum logo ne bs apni maa bahn ki nangi murtiya banai hai our kuch nhi madar chodo tum humare gulam the our rhoge our aand kitna b mots ho jye rhega lund ke niche hi smjhe randi ke bachche and bachchi tum ganduo ki gand mari taj mahal walo ne 800 year tumeri maa bahn ko choda taj mahal me to tumara haq to banta hai hai le our delhi ka laal kila lena ho to mujhse apni bahn chuda lo jitni b girls cnnnt kr rhi ho to mere paas a jao cudne ke ;liye me b tume tajk mahal dungga
taj mahal lena ho to apni bahno ko taj me chuda lolo kuch to mil jyega hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha tumari gand marunga our tumari bahn ki choot hahahahahahahahahahahahahah randi ke bachcho tumpe bolna b a gya wrna salo tum gulam the ho rhoge hahahahahahahahahahahahahahah jago apni bahno ke dallo jago kya sach hain sach ye hai ki tumari bahno ko taj mahal me choda jata tha our ab b chudne jati hai tumari bahn waha tum le jate ho une waha chudwane
kitni b apni maa bahn chuda lo ye humara tha hai rhega smje kafiro tum logo ne bs apni maa bahn ki nangi murtiya banai hai our kuch nhi madar chodo tum humare gulam the our rhoge our aand kitna b mots ho jye rhega lund ke niche hi smjhe randi ke bachche and bachchi tum ganduo ki gand mari taj mahal walo ne 800 year tumeri maa bahn ko choda taj mahal me to tumara haq to banta hai hai le our delhi ka laal kila lena ho to mujhse apni bahn chuda lo jitni b girls cnnnt kr rhi ho to mere paas a jao cudne ke ;liye me b tume tajk mahal dungga
Blogger Mohd Aamir said...
lae chirag aggarwal terae questions ka answer
1-neev babur nae ki
2-haa hai
vaisae eik baat maan-ni padegi ki (for those who r saying that tajmahal was Shiv's temple) tum log kitni bhi kosish kar lo
tajmahal hamara tha,hamara hai,hamara hee rahega, gaand mae dam hai to proof karo.
and mae batata hu truth kya hai
u all r jealous ki tajmahal (eik khoobsoorat makbra muslims nae bana hai...
aur tumnae nahi
and for those who are saying that tajmahal ham sab indians ka hai ..i m with them
PROUD TO BE A MUSLIM
PROUD TO BE A INDIAN
See in all above comments....... Hindus are calm and using polite words most, but maximum muslims using ugly words, this is what their culture... and what the culture they got from their ancestors........
And some hindus are telling to not quarrel in each other for Taj mahal and some hindus clearly denying that it is belongs to hindu.
This what the difference of the best and worst moral of religions based on the followers behavior.....
I am shocked after reading this. Tajmahal should be checked and its all sealed rooms should be closed. It is very interesting to find what is behind the doors which are sealed since a long time. What is there which shouldn't known to people?
madhar chod musalmano ne ye esa kiya tha, tajmahal name badla jana chahiye,or jo musal man ye kahata h ki ye galat h uski gand marni chahiye,sale hamare country me hamara namak khate h,or hammhe hi lutate h,gaddaro ko,namak haramo ko sabak milana chahiye,sale apani maa bahan ko codate rahte h,inka imaan h hi kaha,
i am hurt becauz everybody hadetup a controversy between the religion....remember it is not god who had created all the religions it is us.....why dont we find conclusion rather than fighting over each other?
and taj mahal,whether it is made by a hindu or islam doesn't matter.it is an indian heritage and thats what matters...right???
For all those people who think like perv faisal....
Abe bhikari faisal sunn , pehli baat bheekh tum mangte aaye ho paise ke bhukkhad ,tum aaye the hamare desh me hm tumhare paas bhikh mangne ni gye. the aur kya baat baat pe chudwa lo chudwa lo bol rha h ye koi sex appealing site nhi h ab pta chla ki tmhri families mein itne jyada bachhe q hote h, asli mard h to saaf bat kar maa - behnon ko bich me laane ki koi zaroorat ni h teri chhakkapanti saaf jhalakti hai . isse tmhri khandani islamic sanskriti aur tmhri dharmik naitik shikshaye sb pta chal rhi h aur mat bhulna ki :- all indians r brother & sistr so all hindu sisters = faisal's sisters → ( 1 ) if hindu sisters r fucked therfore by (1) faisal's sister is fucked by faisal toh tejo mahalya tak mat ja. ,jst fuck her in ur room nd similarly dont go to tejo mahalya to fuck ur mother jst do it in ur room too. Dusri bat ye apne dharma ki itni hi chamcha - giri krni thi to indo - pak seperation k bad bhi yhan q jhak mar rha h wahin jake muh mar aur bharat ka ganda bojh kam kar smjha. .....saale tmhre yhaan to mama-bhanji, bhai-behan sab apas men hi shadi kar lete h izzat qa h tm logon ki bhul gaye qa ,ki kaise USA ne tum logon ki pent utarwa kar tmhre muh par peshab ki thi, bhga diye gye the jo whan se wo yad karo zra, tmhri aukat hi yhi h har bat, har jhagde k bich mein auraton ko lana ye to tmhri saalon purani adat h aur us jmane mein kisne raj kiya iska hisab lgane ka ab qa fayda ye dekho ki aaj k developd era mein kaun raj kar rha h
aur ab suno us carbon-testing ka koi jwab h tmhare pas waise b tm log betuki behas krne m to sabse age ho aur aisa kaun sa khjana chhupa rkha h un band darwajon k pichhe ki aj tak use kholne nhi dete agar wakai koi khjana hota to qa bharat sarkar ne use ab tak nikal nhi liya hota kahin unke pichhe shahjhan ne apni baki biwiyon ko to nhi dafna rkha h,, shahjhan k chamche ye to pta hoga na ki uski mumtaj-ul-jmani jinse wo so called pyaar krta tha unke alawa uski aur b kai biwiyan thi. Aur tisri baat agar iska xample chahiye ki hindu monuments k upar muslim sign nahi lgaya h toh ja jake dekh .aankhein phad phad ke , dekh jake chittor garh ke kile ke upar muslims ka sign laga h ...ab yeh toh mat keh dena k voh bhi "shahjahan" ne banvaya tha..jis pr kaamchoor muslims ne apna sign laga diya .aur agar ab bhi tum yeh kehte ho k tmne koi bhi hindu monument mein apni tang ghusedkar muslmani nahi banaya h toh ayodhya mein jo babri masjid bna di ...aur mathura mein jis jail ki cell mein hamare krishn paida hue the uske pass h mein masjid bnaa d , j jake dekh aa, kahin woh bhi shahjahan ne toh nahi banva d
aur ek baat ye yaad rakhna tum sab ke sab k agar hm tumhare allah ke barre mein kuch nai keh rahe h toh ussi allah ke vaste hamare bhagwn ke barre mein kuch kehne k himakat mat krna
woh toh tumhari nek sudhri sharif bhasha ne hamme majbur kar diya warna hum toh diwali mein ali aur ramjan mein raam pujne wale insaan h.
aur h baat aayi shiv g ki muslim hone k toh hamare bhagwan k liye hum bahut h mandir banwne k liye unhe khud banane k ya phir tumhara muslim sign lgane ki koi zaroorat nai ...aur waise bhi har jagah par jahan jahan hamare bhagwan h wahan par tum logon ne ghus ghus kr apni masjide ghusedi h . hamne nahi banwaya tumhari kisi masjid ki jagah apna mandir ..woh tum log ho jo ghus ke mandiro mein banwate ho masjid ...toh iska matlab hua k tmhare allah hindu h...h k nai
jaun adriel aur baki sare mere hindu bhai behno kya tumhe bi aj pata chala ki taj mahal 1 shiv temple he aur vo bi ek angrez se apna itihas , apna koi astitv hai ya nahi
ab to khud ka dimag use karo aur batao ki har ek chiz muslim tombs se kyu milti hai?
jaun adriel aur baki sare mere hindu bhai behno kya tumhe bi aj pata chala ki taj mahal 1 shiv temple he aur vo bi ek angrez se apna itihas , apna koi astitv hai ya nahi
ab to khud ka dimag use karo aur batao ki har ek chiz muslim tombs se kyu milti hai?
Dear acc to a book it was built 300 yrs before even shahjahan was born...he captured the temple from the then king of jaipur "Jai Singh"
Shah jahan had the power to destroy or hide the symbols of Hindu temle and he did the same...there r many hidden rooms in Tejo mahalaya....and shivji was not muslims...but he is the father of all the muslims and hindus..:-)
Yeh zameen uski h jisne use banaya hai those who will not obey him and do not live life on his principles has no right to live in his world..musalmano ko India chodne k liye bolne walo look at ur self if u r not living life on the principles of the one who created u u have no right to live in his world itself..
Jahaan tak taj k sawaal h no point in fighting here..the government is Hindu and also we have technology just open the doors and check it out what is the truth..
Muslims love the lord who created them and also loves the place where they r born whether it be India or any other place in the world..we r the citizens of the world as we obey the creator of the worlds and love all his creations humans ,animals,birds,the land the sky and everything that is created by him...read about Islam all nonmuslim brothers and sisters and learn what ur Lord demands from all of us..whoever will follow the truth will be for their own benefit..our main target should be to save our self from the eternal fire the fuel for which will be humans (who did not even botherbto know the truth) and stones and not fighting for that taj mahal..
Look guys we all Hindus and Muslims should not fight between us , it just leads us to devastation instead "We should sit together and peacefully find solution to it " and please dont disrespect any religion , yes i am a Hindu and i m proud of it and yes We respect Islam and all religions in the world.
Post a Comment