Tuesday, February 20, 2007

HIDDEN TRUTH ABOUT TAJ MAHAL







View of sealed doors & windows in back









Vedic design on ceiling of a locked room















Typical Vedic style corridors














The interior water well













Secret walled door that leads to other rooms that leads to other room















Secret bricked door that hides more evidence





















Red lotus at apex of the entrance










Rear view of the Taj & 22 apartments










Pavilion where Mumtaz is said to be buried








Palace in Barhanpur where Mumtaz died












Interior of one of the 22 secret rooms











Interior of another of the locked rooms










Inlaid pinnacle pattern in courtyard










Huge ventilator sealed shut with bricks














Frontal view of the Taj Mahal and dome












Close up of the pinnacle





















Close up of the dome with pinnacle










Ariel view of Taj Mahal











A marble apartment on ground floor












A locked room on upper floor











300 foot long corridor inside apartments











BBC says about Taj Mahal---Hidden Truth - Never say it is a Tomb Aerial view of the Taj Mahal

NOW READ THIS
....... No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says theTaj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ) .
In the course of his research O ak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court ch ronicle, Badshahnama,Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial . The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur stillretains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place fordead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers. For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal.
He says the term " Mahal " has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria . "The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects. Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani ," he writes. Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace . Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created bycourt sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story. Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a fewsamples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time.Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu templeratherthan a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public . Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi's government t ried to have Prof. Oak's book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the first edition dire consequences . There is only one way to discredit orvalidate Oak's research. The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Ma hal under U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate.

46 comments:

chidanand said...

I was wondered when i read about taj mahal,and i scared about our politicins. now it should b opened to world n i call to all hindus to support and keep pressure on govt.
i proud to b a hindu n i pray to god if their is a another birth 2 me that should b as a HINDU.....

Dipanjan said...

no..taj mahal was not a hindu temple. this is wrong interpretation. It was impossible to built such a magnificent hindu temple so close to the mughal capictal at that time unnoticed. there are loads of hindu temples demolished into mosques but not this one.

palai's digital library said...

If you feel the research by Prof O.P.Oak is false the how the carbon dating of the wooden doors used in Taj Mahal dates 300 years older than age of Sahajahan.

Rajeev said...

The act of cruelty does not vanish without proof. Mulim cruelty is no exception. Some evidences are still available which have been passed as oral tradition from a generation to next. If you go to the villages around jhansi, agra, etawah, kanpur, etah badaun etc. you will find many people who have heard the story from their grandparents that Taj Mahal was a temple and it was plundered by muslims. There may be versions in telling the story about the temple but many old people claim that they heard the story of a great and beautiful Hindu Shiva temple in Agra being plundered by muslims.
I think it is same as teh history of Hindu movement faintly remembered in villages of UP , Rajasthan etc. My grandmother often told me about Shivaji and she said that she got to know about Shivaji from her grandmother. She once told me that her grandmother told her about the military recruitment of Shivaji army in various villages of UP near jhansi, agra etc. Still there are several words in the hindi language of Agra , Etah ,Badaun , Jhansi etc which we find common with Marathi. It shows that these cities saw the arrival of Maratha brigade and culture got mixed. But one thing for sure that Hindu movement against muslims was a successful one across the Bharatvarsha.

Altamash Ansari said...

Well...There are lot of people in this wicked world who are crazy to be popular and this prof. is one of them..but unfortunatly he has picked the topic that can not be true....As he is giving the example of different views of "Taj Mahal" so why he is not concerning the arabic ayats written on the walls of this islamic building...so now if you say this was the shiv mandir and later Shanjahan grabbed this and made all these things that tends to islamic signs.When he had the power to grab whole mahal..but you people think he had'nt the power of destroying all the signs which according to you are looking as hind's signs(which are not actually...this is just a another prospective which you are taking to your side).
Second....if all the ayats was written on the walls of mahal since the mahal was of Shiv..it means Shiv was a muslim.

rahul said...

Muslim are not part of india. This is main think. And this is shiva temple.If muslim say it is not shiv temple then why u people not open these doors that clocked by Muslim ruller. Come infront and open that doors.

Sadaf said...

So the reflection of pinnacle by sun shows a kalash. But did you see that the kalash has "Allah" written inside it?
Courtyard is vedic style. However, everything else is "dome style" which is Mughal architecture.
So does BBC even know who is this Mr. P.N. Oak?
Is this anywhere on BBC records? Well I am sorry to say that the answer is No!
Its funny and ironic that we still believe and write about such things with out even researching our self a little bit.
So what does that mean, that there is no difference between our generation and the previous people who destroyed the monument of Babri masjid and in the name of religion on the side of politics.
I wish that we all learn not to fight over our own heritage and let past be past. And be thankful to God that he gave us birth in such a great country.
I will say - Jago hindustanio jaago! LOL

beenish said...

first of all if people say that carbon dating of wooden doors say the wood is as old as 300 years before shahjahan arrived....so why cannot it be possible...does one usees fresh green stems to build doors!!!! aint the trees were older enough from where the wood was derived??? secondly.....the pinnacle has ALLAH inscribed in it...which you hindus cant see and read!! thirdly...all the architecture has domes...which was typical mughal ! and shahjahan's wife was named Mumtaz Mahal which means 'the most loved one in the palace' and on this name itself Taj got its name.....and talkin about the locked doors and the treasure kept inside....the mughals had there secrets rooms in all the palaces they owned.....it doesn;t mean what kept inside was or is you hindu's property!!!!

vinay said...

abe altamash ansari..............shiv ji ek aadmi nahi tha bahan ke takke wo ek devta hai sale jaise tumhara allah hai.......

haaka said...

now listen to me carefully u foolish people putting the nose of our country down..........as the way i think all the facts given by mr. P.N OAK are just rubbish and the literature's available are also fake abt shahjaha.......
abe yaar taaj mahal to mere dada ji k pardada ne banwaya tha unka naam Mr.akram pandit tha,,,,,bhaichare se raho ......samjheeee kya
ye india hai phaltu bakwaas nahi

Bharateeya said...

Hi people, hindu + Musals' (indians).. Plz do some research and find out more from history point of view. I bet we can definitely find more fossil proof to conclude on if this was an ancient temple or did Shajahan really construct it !!1
Also i would say that your voices should be so loud & reach till the PM & President of India so that they can take inititive to openup all the sealed rooms inside TM and findout more about the reality..

Bharateeya said...

Also does anyone has that recorded vedio/audio of what BBC has told about this ? We should first make sure if this new really came from BBC ? Can we contact BBC and findout ? If yes, then on what basis did they conclude ? Is Prof. P N Oak a real person ? What are his complete findings ?

Druv said...

The truth set you free:

Taj Mahal was a Shiva temple ( Pictographic Evidence )

shahbaz said...

a vinay aeam se bolo
if all sing on taj mahal is of muslim then how u can proof that load shiv has made it if he has made it than it means ge was also muslim because no hindu will make muslim sign on his temple n no muslim will make hindu sign on muslim temple....
so it is clearly seen that taj mahal was made by shahjaha oky.....
who ever is finging this type proof about taj mahal he is the bigest fool.....
n som 1has added a comment that india is hindu country then i should say him that indias half of the popullation is of muslim.....
eg.if i say that taj mahal was made by my grand grandfather than it will be my its just a joke....

Gaurav said...

sab se pehle ye bata du,, k mandir ho ya masjid khud bhagwan or allah nai banate,, dusri baat, jo ye kehte hai k kalash pe allah likha hai to,, shiv ji muslim hue,, wo aisa b soch le k kisi ne allah pe ungli nai uthayi hai,, so pls unhe beech me naa laye,, raha sawal taj ka,, to wo Temple ho sakta hai,, nai bhi ho sakta,, darwaze khul jayenge to saaf ho jayega,, agar muslim logo ne banwaya to bhi hamara hai,, hinduo ne banaya to bhi hamara hai,,, jai shree raam

kuldeep singh said...

ho sakta he ki taj mahal tejo malalya ho .arthath shiv ka mandir ho isiliye mujhe to yah samasya badi gambhir lagi . is samasya ka nirvakaran tabhi hoga jab taj mahal par riserch kar band kothiyo ko khola jaiga aur uske khilaf pukhta saboot ikatthe kiye jaye. isliye mera sujhav yahi he ki hame itihas ka man rakhte hue taj par anubhaviyo dwara risearch ki anumati dine hogi.

Bharatmata ki aavaz said...

Why dont the government throw some light on this by setting a reaserch committee by the archealogical groups containing international archealogists.Who knows like Babri masjid it is also built on a temple.History says that muslim rulers demolished hindu temples or madified them in to mosques and it is natural that to increase muslim religion culture these type of things are done by then rulers.but ultimately those days are gone and now we should think about the development of our country and keep historical facts as historical with truth in it.

Pt.K.K.SARASWAT said...

this sure that taj mahal was not made by shahjahan but before him it was a Hindu madir " TEJO MAHALY " where lord shiv was worshiped by Hindu's .
but govt. of India will never accept it because the politician thought that Muslim are running there politics.they also think that Hindu are week and never will ask for there right on "TEJO MAHALY"

Pt.K.K.SARASWAT said...

this sure that taj mahal was not made by shahjahan but before him it was a Hindu madir " TEJO MAHALY " where lord shiv was worshiped by Hindu's .
but govt. of India will never accept it because the politician thought that Muslim are running there politics.they also think that Hindu are week and never will ask for there right on "TEJO MAHALY"

bhanu pratap singh said...

I think in modern era if anybody are just talking about past facts its just bullshit, just handover it to UN investigation whatever is the results came from team and accept it, everything is possible my dear friends...the big factor is this uneducated votebank in india which creates this problem not only Tajmahal even all temples and Mosques must be investigated by carbon sating and archeologist, be open to everything it might be possible may be there is any mosque we can found in temple as well..

AFROZ said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Manindra Dubey said...

Hamare aur aapke tark karne se na to kuch prove hua hai aur na he hoga...ye to bas ek tarika hai apne ander ke shaitan ko shant karne ka...main ye manta hoon ki na mere kahne se government ye darwaze khulwayegi aur na he koi ye manega ki ye mandir par bana ek maqbara hai ya sach main ek maqbara hai...aur jo bhi log unche padon par baithe hain vo in sab cheezon ki jaanch karane main saksham hai par na to vo jaanch karvange he aur na he satya ko samne layenge...chahe vo government Congress ki ho ya BJP ki...ye sab ek he thali ke chatte batte hain aur hum logon ko ladva kar ke sirf apna ulluo seedha karna jante hain...GOD bless my country and countrymen

braj said...

JAGO HINDU JAGO! it,s a lord shiva, tample...

Vinita Sharma said...

ARRE YAAR MANDIR HO YA MUSLIM BUILDING... HAI TO AJOOBA.. OR HAIN TO INDIA ME.. OR JO MUSLIM INDIA ME RAHTE HAIN WO BHI INDIAN HAIN.. OR JO HINDU YNHA RAHTE HAIN WO BHI INDIAN.. TO KIS BAAT PE BAHAS...

tarun chouksey said...

sach baat jab hindu or mushlim sabhi yaha aa sakte he or taj mahal ki sundarta dekh sakte he toh .... Jhagda kis bat ka.... Bese bhi india me bahut mandir majjid he ....TAJ ko TAJ rehne do...mandir or majjid bana ker kya ker lenge...

GYAN SINGH said...

hamare khandan ke jo raja the unka naam raaja jai singh tha unke mahal me aaj bhi evidence rakhkhe hai mullao ne maanga hamne de diya hamara dil bahot bada hai

GYAN SINGH said...

hamare khandan ke jo raja the unka naam raaja jai singh tha unke mahal me aaj bhi evidence rakhkhe hai mullao ne maanga hamne de diya hamara dil bahot bada hai

dipika khavanekar said...

Hiii... are bhai zagada kyu kar rahe ho....??? jo bhi hai hum INDIAN ka hi to hai....

dipika khavanekar said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
ankit dass said...

Hey.m want gives sme veiws on this topic....first of all i heartly appretiate the research which was was conducted by prof. P.N oak....n may b he is right..bt according to my knowledge..the design of taj mahal is taken from different diffrnt mughal buildings such as frm humayun's tomb , akbar's fort etc... all mughal emprors...so how could it can be a shiv temple.....n secndly and most importantly according to my guide wen i visited taj mahal the word "TAJ" is derived from the design ...which is created inside the taj's building.that is if u observe the pattern which is surrounding the artificial graves of king and queen it is a crown shaped.....so....the word taj must b originated frm there.....bt may b i am not right...these were my point of veiw...thanxx fot reading

Yagna Very said...

if it was not a hindu monument then y was it needed to close many rooms which have many secrets by a shahjan

Yagna Very said...

if it was not a hindu monument then y was it needed to close many rooms which have many secrets by a shahjan

Biken Rai said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Balram singh Pawar said...

Deepika and vinita sharma itna raham ara to ja chat le muslimo ka apni upar bi banwa le unka tajmahal hinduo ki astha ko kalank muslim kam tumdono jada kare ho dehli me rape tumdono ka hona chaiye tha :-@

Chirag Agrawal said...

Agr sare muslman khe ki taj sahjanh ne bnvaya. Man le to vo btaye
1 iski neeb sahjanh se phle kisne rkhi .
2 koi esa mkvra btaoo jha pani ki bood ka chamtkar hota ho . Ye to ab tk siv ki pindi pr boond tpkti haiii.
Tum 2 ka javab do fir me 2 question puchhunga. . .???

arm said...

Boss Do not fight ,better open all the locked rooms in presence of UN and ASI with tight security and tell the world.What is wrong ?Doodh ka Doodh panni ka pani.
let us start "MOHIM" for opening the all the sealed /bricked walls.Put pressure on government but be fair both group should come togather and do this job peacfully ,no DANGA NO FASAD.

faisal ghazi said...

kitni b apni maa bahn chuda lo ye humara tha hai rhega smje kafiro tum logo ne bs apni maa bahn ki nangi murtiya banai hai our kuch nhi madar chodo tum humare gulam the our rhoge our aand kitna b mots ho jye rhega lund ke niche hi smjhe randi ke bachche and bachchi tum ganduo ki gand mari taj mahal walo ne 800 year tumeri maa bahn ko choda taj mahal me to tumara haq to banta hai hai le our delhi ka laal kila lena ho to mujhse apni bahn chuda lo jitni b girls cnnnt kr rhi ho to mere paas a jao cudne ke ;liye me b tume tajk mahal dungga

faisal ghazi said...

taj mahal lena ho to apni bahno ko taj me chuda lolo kuch to mil jyega hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha tumari gand marunga our tumari bahn ki choot hahahahahahahahahahahahahah randi ke bachcho tumpe bolna b a gya wrna salo tum gulam the ho rhoge hahahahahahahahahahahahahahah jago apni bahno ke dallo jago kya sach hain sach ye hai ki tumari bahno ko taj mahal me choda jata tha our ab b chudne jati hai tumari bahn waha tum le jate ho une waha chudwane

faisal ghazi said...

kitni b apni maa bahn chuda lo ye humara tha hai rhega smje kafiro tum logo ne bs apni maa bahn ki nangi murtiya banai hai our kuch nhi madar chodo tum humare gulam the our rhoge our aand kitna b mots ho jye rhega lund ke niche hi smjhe randi ke bachche and bachchi tum ganduo ki gand mari taj mahal walo ne 800 year tumeri maa bahn ko choda taj mahal me to tumara haq to banta hai hai le our delhi ka laal kila lena ho to mujhse apni bahn chuda lo jitni b girls cnnnt kr rhi ho to mere paas a jao cudne ke ;liye me b tume tajk mahal dungga

Mohd Aamir said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Mohd Aamir said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Mohd Aamir said...

Blogger Mohd Aamir said...
lae chirag aggarwal terae questions ka answer
1-neev babur nae ki
2-haa hai

vaisae eik baat maan-ni padegi ki (for those who r saying that tajmahal was Shiv's temple) tum log kitni bhi kosish kar lo
tajmahal hamara tha,hamara hai,hamara hee rahega, gaand mae dam hai to proof karo.
and mae batata hu truth kya hai
u all r jealous ki tajmahal (eik khoobsoorat makbra muslims nae bana hai...
aur tumnae nahi



and for those who are saying that tajmahal ham sab indians ka hai ..i m with them

PROUD TO BE A MUSLIM
PROUD TO BE A INDIAN

chidanand said...

See in all above comments....... Hindus are calm and using polite words most, but maximum muslims using ugly words, this is what their culture... and what the culture they got from their ancestors........

And some hindus are telling to not quarrel in each other for Taj mahal and some hindus clearly denying that it is belongs to hindu.

This what the difference of the best and worst moral of religions based on the followers behavior.....

lokesh kumar said...

I am shocked after reading this. Tajmahal should be checked and its all sealed rooms should be closed. It is very interesting to find what is behind the doors which are sealed since a long time. What is there which shouldn't known to people?

Harsh Kumar said...

madhar chod musalmano ne ye esa kiya tha, tajmahal name badla jana chahiye,or jo musal man ye kahata h ki ye galat h uski gand marni chahiye,sale hamare country me hamara namak khate h,or hammhe hi lutate h,gaddaro ko,namak haramo ko sabak milana chahiye,sale apani maa bahan ko codate rahte h,inka imaan h hi kaha,

shannayah fernandiz said...

i am hurt becauz everybody hadetup a controversy between the religion....remember it is not god who had created all the religions it is us.....why dont we find conclusion rather than fighting over each other?
and taj mahal,whether it is made by a hindu or islam doesn't matter.it is an indian heritage and thats what matters...right???